Documents By Chronology:

Documents By Chronology:The attacks on September 11, 2001 were the catalyst for the “war on terror”– and for a legal revolution in assertions of broad powers for the Commander-in-Chief. In this chronological library of 34 documents, it is possible to chart the decision-making that led to interrogations of prisoners in U.S. custody that were “at a minimum, cruel and inhuman treatment and, at worst, torture,” in the words of the former general counsel of the United States Navy, Alberto Mora.1. Declaration of National Emergencywww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20010914.pdfDATE: September 14, 2001SUBJECT: Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist AttacksAUTHOR: President George W. BushPresident Bush signs a military order declaring a national emergency.2. Memo from John Yoo to Tim Flaniganwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20010925.pdfDATE: September 25, 2001SUBJECT: The President’s Constitutional Authority to Conduct Military Operations Against Terrorist and Nations Supporting ThemAUTHOR: John Yoo, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal CounselThis memo lays out an expansive vision of presidential power, arguing that Congress cannot “place any limits on the President’s determinations as to any terrorist threat, the amount of military force to be used in response, or the method, timing, and nature of the response. These decisions, under our Constitution, are for the President alone to make.”3. Military Commissions Orderwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20011113.pdfDATE: November 13, 2001SUBJECT: “Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War on Terrorism”AUTHOR: President George W. BushThis military order declares the Commander-in-Chief’s unilateral authority to hold prisoners in the war on terror indefinitely.4. Memo from John Yoo to Jim Hayneswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20011228.pdfDATE: December 28, 2001SUBJECT: Possible Habeas Jurisdiction over Aliens Held in Guantanamo Bay, CubaAUTHOR: John Yoo & Patrick Philbin, Deputy Assistant Attorneys General, Office of Legal CounselThis memo concludes that federal district courts would lack jurisdiction to accept habeas petitions from prisoners who were held at Guantanamo.5. Amnesty International Letter to Secretary of Defense Rumsfeldwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020107.pdfDATE: January 7, 2002SUBJECT: N/AAUTHOR: Irene Khan, Secretary General of Amnesty InternationalThe president of Amnesty International writes an urgent letter concerning detainees in U.S. custody, warning against the “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment,” noting hooding and blindfolding detainees is a violation of the Convention Against Torture.6. Memo from John Yoo to Jim Hayneswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020109.pdfDATE: January 9, 2002SUBJECT: “Application of Treaties and Laws to Al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees”AUTHOR: John Yoo, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal CounselIn this memo, Yoo writes “We conclude that these treaties [including Geneva] do not protect members of the al Qaeda organization. We further conclude that that [sic] these treaties do not apply to the Taliban militia.”7. Memo from William Taft to John Yoowww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020111.pdfDATE: January 11, 2002SUBJECT: “Your Draft Memorandum of January 9th”AUTHOR: William Taft IV, Legal Adviser to the State DepartmentDescribing Yoo’s legal analysis as “seriously flawed,” the memorandum also warns that “this raises the risk of future criminal prosecution for U.S. civilian and military leadership and their advisers.”8. Memo from Donald Rumsfeld to Joint Chiefs of Staffwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020119.pdfDATE: January 19, 2002SUBJECT: “Status of Taliban and al Qaeda”AUTHOR: Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of DefenseSecretary Rumsfeld declares that “The United States has determined that Al Qaida and Taliban individuals under the control of the Department of Defense are not entitled to prisoner of war status for purposes of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.”9. Memo from Jay Bybee to Jim Hayneswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020122.pdfDATE: January 22, 2002SUBJECT: “Application of Treaties and Laws to Al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees”AUTHOR: Jay Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal CounselJay Bybee signs off on John Yoo’s January 9th draft, sending it in its final form to Pentagon General Counsel Jim Haynes and White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales. The memo explains that “certain deviations from the text of Geneva III may be permissible, as a matter of domestic law, if they fall within certain justifications or legal exceptions, such as those for self defense.”10. Memo from Alberto Gonzales to President Bushwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020122.pdfDATE: January 25, 2002SUBJECT: “Application of the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War to the Conflict with al Qaeda and the Taliban”AUTHOR: Alberto Gonzales, White House CounselThis memo for the President outlines the benefits of opting out of the Geneva Conventions and lists the benefits of such a finding. Gonzales notes that non-compliance with Geneva “would create a reasonable basis in law that Section 2441 [War Crimes Act] does not apply, which would provide a solid defense to any future prosecution.”11. Memo from Colin Powell to Alberto Gonzaleswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020126.pdfDATE: January 26, 2002SUBJECT: Draft Decision Memorandum for the President on the Applicability of the Geneva Convention to the Conflict in AfghanistanAUTHOR: Colin Powell, Secretary of StateColin Powell warns of the consequences of opting out of the Geneva Convention. “It will reverse over a century of U.S. policy . . . and undermine the prosecutions of the law of war for our troops . . .” He adds, “it may provoke some individual foreign prosecutors to investigate and prosecute our officials and troops.”12. Letter from John Ashcroft to President Bushwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020201.pdfDATE: February 1, 2002SUBJECT: N/AAUTHOR: John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralJohn Ashcroft concludes that opting out of Geneva “would provide the highest assurance that no court would subsequently entertain charges that American military officers, intelligence officials, or law enforcement officials violated Geneva Convention rules relating to field conduct, detention conduct or interrogation of detainees.”13. Memo from Jay Bybee to Alberto Gonzaleswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020207.pdfDATE: February 7, 2002SUBJECT: Status of Taliban Forces Under Article 4 of the Third Geneva Convention of 1949AUTHOR: Jay Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal CounselIn this memo, Jay Bybee states that the President has the power to ignore Geneva’s requirement that prisoners be given “Article 5” hearings to establish their status as POWs. “The President. may use his constitutional power to interpret treaties and apply them to the facts, to make the determination that the Taliban are unlawful combatants.. We therefore conclude that there is no need to establish tribunals to determine POW status under Article 5.”14. Memo from President Bush to Vice President, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, et. al.www.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020207-2.pdfDATE: February 7, 2002SUBJECT: Humane Treatment of al Qaeda and Taliban DetaineesAUTHOR: President George W. BushPresident George W. Bush declares that the United States will not be bound by the Geneva Convention’s protections for prisoners of war.15. Memo from Jay Bybee to Jim Hayneswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020226.pdfDATE: February 26, 2002SUBJECT: “Potential Legal Constraints Applicable to Interrogations of Persons Captured by U.S. Armed Forces in Afghanistan”AUTHOR: Jay Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal CounselIn the wake of the capture of the “American Taliban” John Walker Lindh, questions about the rights of American citizens captured in the war on terror became a new issue. In conclusion, Bybee notes “even if the Government did in fact violate Rule 4.2 by having military lawyers interrogate represented persons (including Mr. Walker) without consent of counsel, it would not follow that the evidence obtained in that questioning would be inadmissible at trial.”16. Memo from Jay Bybee to Alberto Gonzaleswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020801-1.pdfDATE: August 1, 2002SUBJECT: “Standards for Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. 2340 – 2340A”AUTHOR: Jay Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal CounselIn what has become notorious as the “torture memo,” Jay Bybee signs off on an opinion authored by John Yoo. The memorandum systematically dismisses numerous U.S. federal laws, treaties and international law prohibiting the use of torture, essentially defining the term out of existence.17. Letter from John Yoo to Alberto Gonzaleswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020801-3.pdfDATE: August 1, 2002SUBJECT: N/AAUTHOR: John Yoo, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal CounselJohn Yoo writes to White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales warning of potential threats of international prosecution regarding the administration’s interrogation policies. Yoo notes that “Interrogations of al Qaeda members … cannot constitute a war crime” because of the Presidential determination that Geneva’s protections do not apply.18. Memo from Jay Bybee to the CIAwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020801-2.pdfDATE: August 1, 2002SUBJECT: Memorandum for [REDACTED] Interrogation of [REDACTED]AUTHOR: Jay Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal CounselWritten by the Office of Legal Counsel’s Jay Bybee and sent to the Central Intelligence Agency, this heavily redacted document was released to the ACLU in 2008. It details “advising the CIA regarding interrogation methods it may use against al Qaeda members,” and in one un-redacted portion, argues that “to violate the statute, an individual must have the specific intent to inflict severe pain or suffering. Based on the information you have provided us, we believe those carrying out these procedures would not have the specific intent to inflict severe pain or suffering.”19. Guantanamo Trip Reportwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20020927.pdfDATE: September 27, 2002SUBJECT: Trip Report, DOD General Counsel Visit to GTMOAUTHOR: Office of the Staff Judge AdvocateA one page summary of Pentagon General Counsel Jim Haynes, and Vice President Cheney’s legal counsel David Addington’s trip to Guantanamo on September 25, 2002. The report notes that their stated purpose was to “receive briefings on Intel successes, Intel challenges, Intel techniques, Intel problems and future plans for facilities.”20. Guantanamo Meeting Minuteswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20021002.pdfDATE: October 2, 2002SUBJECT: Counter Resistance Strategy Meeting MinutesAUTHOR: N/AA senior CIA lawyer meets with military officials at Guantanamo, and states that laws banning torture are “basically subject to perception. If the detainee dies, you’re doing it wrong.” The Pentagon’s top legal adviser at the camp responds, “We will need documentation to protect us.” When the military’s top criminal investigator reads the minutes, he forwards them to other senior personnel, noting “This looks like the kind of stuff Congressional hearings are made of.” Waterboarding, for example, would “shock the conscience of any legal body looking at the results of the interrogations or possibly even the interrogators. Somebody needs to be considering how history will look back at this.”21. Memo from Major General Michael Dunlaveywww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20021011.pdfDATE: October 11, 2002SUBJECT: “Counter-Resistance Strategies”AUTHOR: Major General Michael DunlaveyGeneral Michael Dunlavey sends a formal request for approval of harsh interrogation techniques based on SERE up the chain of command to General James T. Hill, commander of USSOUTHCOM. The most extreme “Category III” techniques mirror “those used in U.S. military interrogation resistance training or by other US government agencies.”22. Memo from General James T. Hillwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20021025.pdfDATE: October 25, 2002SUBJECT: “Counter-Resistance Strategies”AUTHOR: General James T. HillGeneral James Hill, commander of USSOUTHCOM, forwards the request to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, but worries that, “I am particularly troubled by the use of implied or expressed threats of death of the detainee or his family.”23. Action Memo from Jim Haynes to Donald Rumsfeldwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20021127-1.pdfDATE: November 27, 2002SUBJECT: “Counter-Resistance Techniques”AUTHOR: William J. Haynes, General Counsel, Department of DefenseSecretary Rumfeld’s General Counsel Jim Haynes, sends an “action memo” for the Secretary’s signature advising Rumsfeld to approve a list of harsh interrogation techniques. On December 2, 2002 Rumsfeld signs off, and authorizes all the Category I & II techniques, including 20 hour interrogations, deprivation of light and auditory stimuli, removal of clothing, the use of phobias such as dogs, and stress positions for up to four hours. Haynes notes that Category III techniques, including waterboarding, “may be legally available” but “as a matter of policy a blanket approval. is not warranted at this time.” As Secretary Rumsfeld signs the action memo, he adds a post-script “I stand for 8-10 hours a day. Why is standing limited to 4 hours?”24. FBI Legal Analysiswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20021127-2.pdfDATE: November 27, 2002SUBJECT: Legal AnalysisAUTHOR: N/AAn FBI agent warns his superiors that several of the techniques being considered “are not permitted by the U.S. constitution” and others are “examples of coercive interrogation techniques that may violate 18 U.S.C. § 2340 (Torture Statute).”25. Draft Guantanamo SERE SOPwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20021210.pdfDATE: December 10, 2002SUBJECT: JTF GTMO “SERE” Interrogation Standard Operating ProcedureAUTHOR: Lt. Col. Ted MossThis draft memo, never before released in its entirety, directly links the tactics being used at Guantanamo to the U.S. military’s torture resistance training: “These tactics and techniques are used in SERE school to ‘break’ SERE detainees. The same tactics and techniques can be used to break real detainees during interrogation operations.”26. SERE Instructors’ Guantanamo Reportwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20030115-4.pdfDATE: January 15, 2003SUBJECT: After Action Report Joint Task Force Guantanamo Bay (JTF-GTMO) Training EvolutionAUTHOR: John F. Rankin, SERE Training Specialist & Christopher Ross, SERE CoordinatorResponding to a “high level directive,” two SERE instructors travel to Guantanamo, where they lead a class of 24 Guantanamo interrogators on the use of SERE techniques based on “Biderman’s Principles.” Principles include death threats, degradation, and “induced debilitation.”27. Memo from Donald Rumsfeldwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20030115-1.pdfDATE: January 15, 2003SUBJECT: “Counter Resistance Techniques”AUTHOR: Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of DefenseSecretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld rescinds his authorization of the Category II and III techniques authorized by his December 2, 2002 order.28. Memo from Donald Rumsfeld Establishing Working Groupwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20030115-2.pdfDATE: January 15, 2003SUBJECT: Detainee InterrogationsAUTHOR: Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of DefenseSecretary Rumsfeld orders a Working Group comprised of senior military lawyers to study the legality of various interrogation techniques.29. The JAG Memoswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20030205.pdfDATE: February 5 – March 13, 2003SUBJECT: N/AAUTHORS: Military Judges Advocate GeneralTop military lawyers in the Working Group issue a series of vigorous dissents to many of the proposed techniques being discussed.30. Memo from John Yoo to Jim Hayneswww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20030314.pdfDATE: March 14, 2003SUBJECT: Military Interrogation of Alien Unlawful Combatants Held Outside the United StatesAUTHOR: John Yoo, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal CounselWritten at the request of DoD General Counsel William Haynes, the memo is an expansion of John Yoo’s August, 2002 “torture memo” and lays out in more expansive detail what would be permitted under the administration’s interrogation policy. Haynes makes it clear that the memo is the “controlling authority” for the Working Group.31. Working Group Reportwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20030404.pdfDATE: April 4, 2003SUBJECT: “Working Group Report on Detainee Interrogations in the Global War on Terrorism”AUTHOR: N/AThe report of the Working Group on interrogation policy is signed out. In 85-pages, it endorses a series of 35 interrogation techniques including “fear up harsh,” “emotional love,” “emotional hate,” “hooding,” and “sleep adjustment.” Though it is signed out in their names, members of the Working Group were not informed of its final contents.32. Memo from Donald Rumsfeldwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20030416.pdfDATE: April 16, 2003SUBJECT: “Counter-Resistance Techniques in the War on Terrorism”AUTHOR: Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of DefenseRumsfeld issues a memorandum to the commander of US Southern Command authorizing 24 of the 35 techniques for use at Guantanamo.33. Interrogation “Wish List” E-mailwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20030814.pdfDATE: August 14, 2003SUBJECT: N/AAUTHOR: N/AThis memo issued by a U.S. Army military intelligence officer requests that interrogators come up with a “wish list” of interrogation techniques for use in Iraq. The memo notes, “The gloves are coming off gentleman regarding these detainees. [REDACTED] has made it clear that we want these individuals broken.” Responding, another interrogator suggests, “… a baseline interrogation technique that at a minimum allows for physical contact resembling that used by SERE instructors. Sleep deprivation. Fear of dogs and snakes appear to work nicely. I firmly agree that the gloves need to come off.”34. Memo from General Sanchezwww.torturingdemocracy.org/documents/20030914.pdfDATE: September 14, 2003SUBJECT: “CJTF-7 Interrogation and Counter Resistance Policy”AUTHOR: General Ricardo Sanchez, Commander of US Forces in IraqGeneral Ricardo Sanchez issues guidelines for the interrogation of Iraqi detainees. The techniques he authorizes are almost a verbatim copy of those authorized for Guantanamo by Secretary Rumsfeld in April, 2003.

One Response to “ Documents By Chronology: ”

  1. im4wur Says:

    Thank you for posting these!